A) Decorative shift or compass distortion?
We are categorized much easier than before.
Right or left; Nationalist or socialist.
Although we are particularly opposed to this classification, arguing that both currents are non-national.“We are not right-wing or left-wing, we are Turkish nationalists.” We were saying, but our great nation is looking at us in the right way. Let it be.
Intellectual definitions, preferences and classifications have become very difficult nowadays. Even confused.
Recently, a woman came out to support the nationalism of her established party. “We are Renan nationalists.” He said, but what he said, friends who said Google attacked. Those who asked us questions also received detailed answers. (One)
In politics, in ecology, representation or, more generally, distributorship is nothing new.
For a long time, the British opposition, the American mandate, the friends of Russia, the friends of China, the pro-EU and the pro-Arabs have always occupied an important place in our politics. (2nd)
I think this is the main branch of our recent political history.
The CHP of our age, hence the New CHP or Kılıçdaroğlu’s party, is an important laboratory in this regard.
An organization that needs a lot of research.
I don’t know, maybe I’m wrong. CHP is the CHP we know, but it’s only Mr. Kamal and his team who missed the point and felt the compass or rhetorical slippage …
Tao came out in the study.
Let’s take a look at the symptoms …
See what K চেয়ারম্যানlıçdaroğlu, the chairman of the party founded by my grandfather Mostafa Kemal Ataturk, has instructed for NATO; “We do not see NATO as a mere defense tool or institution. NATO is now a guarantee of democracy in the 21st century “…
I am deeply concerned about the intentions of Kamal Bay in this statement. Because, to bring NATO and democracy together, and above all, to see NATO as a guarantee of democracy ”, what kind of mood, what kind of knowledge and what kind of political history?
Leave it to the CHP leader, even an average person who knows and reads the Turkish coup, the death penalty, the imprisonment, the charges and the convicts, cannot say it. Her conscience hurts, her heart bleeds!
Unfortunately, these words have been internalized and these words have been created.
Of course, our entry into NATO was an obligation. In the 1950’s, there was a need to determine our status and protect the site during the Cold War.
OK, but what if we accept NATO’s intervention in our internal affairs and see NATO as a guarantee of democracy, knowing that it has prepared Turkey for a coup with blood, and is stepping on the bloodshed of our brothers !?
It’s impossible to understand!
This “6. Welcome Fleet” What do you mean? Isn’t this a contempt for the memory of youth and the much-admired anti-US imperialist era?
Isn’t this the desire to see the orange, blue and red revolution in Turkey?
Isn’t it stabbing the country in the back like SOROS and NED?
B) Other examples of this in CHP
Yes, Ecole is the most important thing in our political history.
It is known that there was British influence / interference in political initiatives like constitutional monarchy and Tanzimat.
We all know how deep the German influence / school went before and during the First World War and how the biggest front of our war of independence was opened against the “Mandetists”.
I think it would be a mistake to say that the zero point of our recent political history, which started with the Republic, is CHP… and let us not forget that CHP has gone out of our control even after the first term, ie our access to NATO. Immediately.
At this point, not getting too confused;
Let’s also keep in mind that Qasim Gulek’s closeness to CHP’s pro-US general secretaries Qasim Gulek and Fethullah Gulen (3) is highly mysterious.
Let the new day come;
1) CHP’s allegations about Turkey to foreign state consuls;
2) Another important US CHP supporter, Ünal Çeviköz, called on US President Biden to re-emphasize democracy and intervene in Turkey!
3) Faik Oztrak, Assistant to Kamal Darwish and former IMF Commissioner, holds a high-level position in CHP,
In fact, CHP’s reliance on NATO may be one of the reasons for the rhetorical and compass slippage …
1) It is difficult for this woman to understand that Turkish nationalism is a major concept and it cannot be hung on any concept. For some reason, Atatর্rk’s statement “we are directly Turkish nationalists” cannot be questioned.
2) The decision taken in Erzurum and Sivas Congress is enough.
3) See, https://www.egedesonsoz.com/yazar/baslik/15321 (Americanist hand in CHP and IP)