Decisions that put an end to “good behavior” exemptions in sexual harassment – real

The incident took place on 28 July 2020 in Merkezefendi district. DA, who was out of work, took a minibus from Bayrameri to go home. After DA, Hassan Ali Sekin got into the same car. Sekin landed in the same place as AD and followed him to the apartment where his house is located. Hassan Ali Sekin first verbally abused AD, which he followed. Sekin then threatens AD with a knife and physically assaults him with his hand. Sekin escapes when DA’s family opens the door. On the family’s notice, Sekin was caught with police work. Sekin, who was identified by DA from his hand tattoo, was arrested.

A case was filed against Hassan Ali Sekin in the second criminal court in the first instance on charges of ‘simple sexual harassment’. Sekin denies the allegations and is sentenced to nine years in prison. The court reduced the sentence to 7.5 years by appealing to the court to reduce the good behavior due to the attitude and behavior of the accused.

“I left, thinking they formed me.”

DA’s attorney, Melike Ilkgul Yarturk, said the sentence handed down by the local court was less and that the defendants’ lawyers should appeal. The case is being re-heard in the 6th Penal Chamber of the Antalya Regional Court. Sekin, who was re-examined, said, “I don’t know DA before, we exchanged glances in the minibus. I was fascinated by his gaze. I got off the minibus after him to offer him friendship. I got on the elevator with her. I told her I liked her. I asked her for her phone number, she couldn’t give her a job. She said we can meet at the store. When she said she was going to get engaged in 3 days. I asked her to show me the photo of her fianc. She took out the phone and showed me the photo, but I tried to bend over because it didn’t suit me. It bothered the DA. I thought they were conspiring. I did not tear DA’s shirt. I did not take any action against him. I have heard that there were allegations against some people before. I think DA has a mental disorder. I want my release.

“I wanted to do the trick but it didn’t happen.”

In his statement, the DA said he did not realize the accused was following him and said, “I entered the apartment and took the elevator. When I got down, the accused started kissing me. He tried to touch my body. He covered her. He grabbed me by the throat with his hand so that I wouldn’t scream. I couldn’t scream. My brother opened the door of the house and saw me screaming. He threw him and called his father. I wanted to pay, but it didn’t happen. He tore my athlete to pieces at the time of the incident. I am the complainant, “he said.

Imprisonment for 12 years

As a result of the trial, the 6th Criminal Chamber overturned the decision of the local court for the accused. It decided that the accused Hassan Ali Sekin would be sentenced to a total of 12 years imprisonment, considering the social and precautionary nature of the punishment and the continuity of his detention. In conclusion, “Defendant stated that he asked for the victim’s phone number in the elevator, that he would not give the victim’s phone number, but said that he was working in the store, he would be engaged within 3 days, and he showed pictures of his fianc and if he talked to the victim. No, but it was not possible for her to know these things, but a fianc told a man that she had accepted that her speech and showing photographs were not consistent with the normal course of her life, concluding that the accused easily followed the victim. And can detect information available from his social media account. Considering that he did not behave, section 62 of the TPC should not be applied in his favor.

“Exemplary decision made”

DA’s lawyer Melike Ilkgul Yarturk said that an exemplary decision was made, The accused was sentenced by the local court to 9 years imprisonment and in this decision, his good behavior was reduced to 7 years and 6 months imprisonment. The regional court of appeals gave the best answer. Discount canceled. No reduction was made and the sentence was increased to 12 years. The Supreme Court has upheld that sentence. Written as a justification, the punishment given to the accused has been increased for social and cautionary reasons due to the social significance of this crime. It has been revealed that the social importance of punishment as well as their resistance should be taken into consideration and these issues should be taken into consideration by the court in the hearing of this matter. Says

Leave a Comment