13th hearing in Pinar Gultekin case! The decision was awaited

Pınar Gültekin, a student of Mugla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, went missing on 16 July 2020. His ex-girlfriend, Cemal Metin Avcı, who was taken into custody five days later as part of an investigation, has admitted that he strangled Gultekin at the start of the fight, left his body in a barrel in a vineyard and burned it, and poured concrete on it. Gultekin’s partially burned body was found in the barrel where Avcı indicated. Cemal Metin Avcı, who was referred to court, was arrested on charges of ‘murder with a terrible feeling and pain’. From Avcı’s brother, Mertcan Avcı’s phone signal, it was determined that he was in the vineyard at the same time as his brother. Mertcan Avcı, who was taken into custody, was also arrested.

Mertcan Avcı was released on February 15, 2021, with an obligation to sign and a ban on leaving the country. Pinar Gultekin’s family lawyer, the mother of the accused Semal Matin Avsy, Aiten Avsy, his father Selim Avsy, his divorced ex-wife Ada Karagun and his partner Shakru Gokhan Orhan have also filed a complaint, claiming that they “committed the crime of destruction”, concealed and evidence. Change “. The Mughal Public Prosecutor’s Office ruled on 2 October 2020 that there was no room for additional prosecution of the suspects.

The family’s lawyer, Rezan Apojdemir, appealed to the court’s chief public prosecutor’s office, requesting that the final decision of the Mughal Criminal Court of Peace be overturned by the Ministry of Justice for the benefit of the law. The Office of the Chief Prosecutor overturned the decision and decided to frame charges against 4 suspects. The new indictment, prepared by the prosecutor’s office, found that suspects Selim Avsy, Aiten Avsy, Ada Karagun and Shakru Gokhan Orhan had a strong suspicion that they had gone to the crime scene together during the ‘intentional homicide’. And demanded a separate punishment for them by destroying and concealing the signs of crime.

Flamingo observation from Google Earth

Flamingo observation from Google Earth

The court has decided to join 2 files

At the 9th hearing of the case, held on January 24, 2022, the prosecutor announced his opinion. Prosecutors said it was unanimously accepted that Pinar Gultekin was on fire while he was alive, and that Semal Matin demanded that Avesi be punished for “killing in a terrible way.” Mertcan Avcı’s ‘acting to conceal and change evidence of crime’, Cemal Metin Avcı’s ex-wife Eda Karagün, his business partner Şükrü Gökhan Orhan, his mother Ayten and his father Selim Avcı will be punished for the crime of destroying and concealing. I want criminal evidence.

Gultekin’s family lawyer, Rezan Epzdemir, once again applied to the prosecutor’s office for the arrest of Martkan Avesi, who had previously been released on judicial control. Mertkan Avici was arrested on 21 February for a crime of murder with a horrible feeling and torture.

He applied for life imprisonment

The indictment, prepared by Mugala Deputy Chief Public Prosecutor Ali Senkaduz, alleges that Mertcan Avcı did nothing to stop and extinguish the fire at the barrel where Pinar Gultekin was located, and that his brother was punished. A further life sentence has been requested for “taking part in the murder and torturing him with a terrible feeling”.

Fire at a pharmaceutical factory in Kokley

Fire at a pharmaceutical factory in Kokley

The court returned the claim

The chargesheet was sent to the Mughal 3rd High Criminal Court. The court decided to withdraw the charge on the grounds that it was prepared without evidence that could directly affect the crime. Mughal Deputy Chief Public Prosecutor Ali Sen appealed against the decision to extradite him twice. In his objection, Dujgun said that the investigation conducted against Mertcan Avcı had gathered all the evidence that could be gathered with the available information and found sufficient evidence to create suspicion that the crime had taken place.

The prosecutor’s office objected

The Mughal 1st Criminal Court, which assessed the objections of the prosecutor’s office, accepted the complaint. In its conclusion, in order to justify the objection, “since it was concluded that Pinar was charged with making all possible decisions based on the exact cause of death and the information available to determine the time. The decision to return the complaint was not appropriate. Was told.

Cheap food source with urban agriculture

Cheap food source with urban agriculture

2nd transfer to MERTCAN AVCI on the objection of the lawyer

His lawyer objected to the arrest of Mertcan Avcı. Assessing the objections, the Mughal 3rd Criminal Court, in view of the present circumstantial evidence, decided to release Avcı, rejecting the defendant’s request for detention with the same evidence, the absence of any suspicion of absconding and the possibility of an appeal against him. Compliance with judicial control system.

Case about mother

In a complaint prepared by the prosecutor’s office, Semal Matin Avici was sentenced to 4 years and 4 months in prison for insulting Semal Matin Avsi, saying, “I will kill you, dog. The lawsuit was settled out of court. Is done.

At the 12th hearing of the case on May 16, the state gave its opinion on the merits. In his opinion, the prosecutor demanded that Cemal Metin Avcı be sentenced to life imprisonment for “killing with painful feelings and for killing with painful feelings” and his brother Mertcan Avcı for participating in the crime of killing with a terrible feeling and for torturing him. Will be punished. ” According to the plan, Eda Karagün, Şükrü Gökhan Orhan, mother Ayten and father Selim Avcı were also sentenced to 2 to 5 years in prison for “hiding and destroying evidence.”

The accused will appear in court for the 13th time today. In addition to Gultekin’s family, the defendants, who are on trial pending trial, are expected to attend the hearing, which is expected to decide.

Leave a Comment